Pet Peeves on Porters

Posted on 06:00, March 8th, 2007 by Ron

If you haven’t read my article on Brown’s Brewing, do so first for some background. After you have done that, you can listen to my little rant…

Why do all porters have to be so smoky? I’m ok with some roasted flavors, smoky notes, stoneporter.jpgand even wood characteristics… but WHY WHY WHY do all porters seem to want to taste like an ash tray???

Come on people, the porter style should be a hoppy beer. The definition for an English robust porter specifically states “These porters have a sharp bitterness of black malt without a highly burnt/charcoal flavor”, and “hop bitterness should be medium to high.” At least Stone tells you that they intend to make it smokey.

My all time favorite porter is made locally at the Brown’s Brewery, though they only brew it on occasion these days. The only bottled porter I have ever had the pleasure of is the Big Indian Porter by Woodstock Brewery in Woodstock, New York. Outside of those porters, there has never been a porter I have loved. I have tried Sierra Nevada’s, Stovepipe, Sam Adams, Saranac, Fuller’s… the list goes on and on and I don’t like any of them (much). They all have something I find that takes away from the beer just being beer.

I’ve recently had a Planet Porter from Boulder Brewing and it was chalky and sooty like the majority out there. The sad part is that I could taste a decent beer underneath all that, but it was destroyed by the roast/burnt/smoke.

Can anyone, PLEASE, recommend me a porter that tastes like beer??? I’m looking for malt, hops and yeast; nothing else. And I want it strong, not in alcohol, but in flavor, like porter should be. Malt, hops and yeast.

Related posts

Posted in Beer, Styles | Print

Comments

Eli on 8 March, 2007 at 11:28 am
Gravatar for Anonymous

I really like Bell’s Porter.

Nice new look, by the way!

Med on 8 March, 2007 at 12:44 pm
Gravatar for Anonymous
Ron on 8 March, 2007 at 1:10 pm
Gravatar for Anonymous

I think I can get the Southern Tier… I’ll try it.

…And, thanks Eli.

KevBrews on 8 March, 2007 at 2:02 pm
Gravatar for Anonymous

Dammit, Eli beat me to it. Bell’s porter is my all-time favorite porter. Lots of rich chocolate and coffee flavors. I did a review of it a while back, which you can find here:
http://kevbrews.blogspot.com/2006/10/review-bells-porter.html

Funny, a friend of mine and I were just talking about this today and the two we mentioned were Bell’s and Southern Tier.

Ron on 9 March, 2007 at 11:32 am
Gravatar for Anonymous

I couldn’t find the Bell, but I did pick up the Southern Tier Porter - I’ll be having one as soon as I get home from work tonight!

Jason on 9 March, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Gravatar for Anonymous

I agree that it’s very hard to find a good commercial porter. However, you say you want malt, hops, yeast, and nothing else. The bad porters you mentioned DO have malt, hops, yeast, and nothing else. They’re just not the malts that you’d like them to use :)

Ron on 9 March, 2007 at 11:32 pm
Gravatar for Anonymous

Jason - Fair comment… I’m looking for porters where, as you say, use the malts I want them to use; roasted malts in amounts that don’t control the beer and cover up the hop bitterness.

I also just want to clarify that the porters I did mention I don’t consider bad beer… just not what I want. (Stone makes excellent stuff)

BurlingtonTom on 17 April, 2007 at 9:31 pm
Gravatar for Anonymous

Two porters I thought had some balance between smoke and malt were Anchor Porter and Smuttynose Robust Porter. Give them a try. Most others are dominated by smoke.

Dom on 3 May, 2007 at 8:26 am
Gravatar for Anonymous

Try the Samuel Smith Taddy Porter! IMHO the best porter.

Regards from Switzerland.
Dom

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Website:
Comments:
Search: