Women may make better professional beer tasters than men

In a Wall Street Journal article, the idea that women may make better beer tasters (primarily at the big industrial brewers where it’s vitally important that each batch taste the same as the previous thousands) is explored.

No glass ceiling for the best job in the world

At many companies, the assembled panelists would have been men, typically brew masters and other technical types. And it makes sense. To judge from TV commercials, men like beer better than women do and sometimes even seem to like beer more than they like women.

But the British company SABMiller PLC decided several years ago to reach deeper into its employee pool to find adept tasters, inviting marketers, secretaries and others to try their hand. The company concluded that women were drinking men under the table.

“We have found that females often are more sensitive about the levels of flavor in beer,” says Barry Axcell, SABMiller’s chief brewer. Women trained as tasters outshine their male counterparts, he says.

Honestly, this doesn’t surprise me at all. My wife has a much more sensitive nose than I do. (Which she reminds me of all of the time, often right before she reminds me to clean the cat boxes.) I often ask her to sniff a beer I’m sampling to see if she picks up something more subtle than I have been able to detect.

IPA Bake Off

Back in October we tried an Octoberfest bake off (a taste test) and it wasn’t that successful. Nice.. not thrillin’, but nice. So when a different group of my friends suggested a blind IPA taste testing, I wasn’t very optimistic; but of course I was game anyway.

Surprise! Not only was it a great evening, the winners and losers made it all that much more interesting. We scored them differently than I had done previously, not just on an overall impression like the unofficial Hop-Talk rating system is built upon, but rather a much more detailed method using a standard beer judging sheet. It is based on an overall score of 50 points made up of several categories.

scoring chart

Here are the results. I rounded the averages of the four of us playing judge…

ipa-taste-test
My comments after the tasting go like this…
Rogue - Yes, it stood alone at the top.
Stone – One of my favorite IPA’s. My score for it probably would have been higher but I hadn’t just taken a break in tasting for a slice of Buffalo Pizza… probably not the best idea and probably affected the overall result.
Butternut – We were all surprised by this one, but me most of all as I really don’t like Butternut’s other brews. I’m going to have to go back for this one.
Middle Ages – While we all know and love this IPA, none of us expected it to rate so high. Glad to see it up there.
Sam Smith – I nailed the import.

I had a great time doing this… I don’t know if the flavors varied that much greater than the octoberfest styles, or if the method in judging was what made it so much better. In any case, the casual nature and long evening in which we took to do it was one for the books.

Special thanks to our servers, Ellie & Katie, and their scientific strategy to organization assuring accurate test results. (We will excuse the Yuengling Porter incident.)

Octoberfest bake-off

Another way we entertained ourselves during our annual get-together was to have an “Octoberfest bake-off”. Ron, Max, Don and I each brought a few Märzens (Oktoberfestbier) and did blind tastings.

Well, it wasn’t all blind. We knew what we brought and Ron also knew what each was before we had it. However, it was significantly different from Ron’s Oktoberfest Beer Battle from a couple of years ago.

Our primary conclusions from tasting all these are:

1. Oktoberfest is not our favorite style;
2. Most brewers, at least in the U.S., are extremely close to each other in how their recipes turn out (whether they are “true” to the “real” style is another discussion entirely);
3. Drinking a dozen beers of the same style messes with your palate; and
4. Eating bratwurst in the middle of our tasting may have been the best and the worst idea we had.

Another surprise was how poorly (relatively) our annual favorite of Brooklyn Brewery Oktoberfest did in our rankings.

Our methodology was simply to rate each according to the Unofficial Hop Talk Beer Rating System. We didn’t try to rate the beers based on any official or unofficial description of the style, just how much we enjoyed each.

Here is the final results:
1. Victory Festbier (3.375)
2. Left Hand Brewing Marzen Lager (3.16)
3. Brooklyn Brewery Oktoberfest (3.125)
(tie) Flying Dog Dogtoberfest (3.125)
5. Lancaster Brewing Oktoberfest (3.00)
(tie) Clipper City Baltomarzhon (3.00)
7. Samuel Adams Octoberfest (2.75)
(tie) Paulaner Oktoberfest-Marzen Amber (2.75)
(tie) Atwater Bloktoberfest (2.75)
10. Saranac Octoberfest (2.5)
11. Stoudt’s Oktoberfest (2.125)
12. Weihenstephaner FestBier (1.5)

Craft beer is preferred in blind tastings

The “blind taste test” has been around, well, at least as long as any modern marketing gimmick. Remember The Pepsi Challenge?

Recently, Charlie Papazian related the results of three separate blind tastings he conducted in 1999. The results were, in a word, predictable. If you are a beer geek, at least. Locally-brewed craft beer beat industrial-brewed imports by overwhelming margins.

Drink beer with your mouth, not your eyes. Prelude to revisiting “What makes good beer?”

In Arizona 100 beer enthusiasts and their friends and spouses turned up at the Pusch Ridge Brewing Company and Pub. Another beer tasting was held. The results: Sam Adams 42 versus Corona 3; bottled Sierra Nevada Pale Ale 27 versus Bass Ale on draft 19; Guinness on Draft 1 (that is correct, 1) versus Pusch Ridge Old Pueblo Stout 47.

As in all the tastings the beers were all served in glasses without any indication of origin. Brand loyal, die-hard Guinness drinkers were stunned. Bass Ale aficionados would not believe their vote. There were a few Corona drinkers that evening who were no more.

I’m convinced more than ever that I need to get my die-hard-ipa-is-too-rough-Bud-Light-or-nothing neighbor over and have him sample some of the locally-brewed light lagers side-by-side with his preferred libation. I’ll consider it an act of mercy.

Update: Fixed link to Charlie’s article. Sorry about that.

The Rule of Three

It should come as no surprise that I like to try beer that I’ve never had before. (If it does, you’re probably reading the wrong blog.) Oh, sure, I have my favorites and “go-to” beers that I know I can always buy and enjoy, but I never would have found them without experimenting.

It used to be that the smallest unit of beer I could try was a six-pack. (I hadn’t yet discovered the joy of the bomber.) If I enjoyed a beer, that was no problem. But if I didn’t enjoy it, well, now I had 3five beers that I refused to waste and that I knew I wouldn’t really enjoy.

All that changed when I discovered a retailer that encouraged its customers to create their own mixed six-packs. Bliss! Or so I thought. While I could now try six times as many beers for the same amount of money (more or less) I was finding myself disappointed that I didn’t have a second beer of one I found I enjoyed. Often if I was going to have two or three beers, I didn’t want to have something different every time. Sometimes that’s what I want, and some times not.

So, my new modus operandi of buying mixed six-packs wasn’t as blissful as I imagined. Then, in a conversation in a totally unrelated context*, I found enlightenment.

It takes at least three beers to decide if you like a beer. First, you need to cleanse your palate. Then you need to train your tongue. Now you’re ready to really taste it.

However, like the Force, there is a dark side.

You can decide that you don’t like a beer after one…or less.

It all makes so much sense now. I will now try buying mixed six-packs of only two beers. If I like one, I’ll be able to make sure that I’ve fully tasted it. If I really like it, I won’t be disappointed by not having more in the fridge. And, if it is one of those situations where I don’t really care for it, there are only two more that I need to either struggle through or foist on someone else.


* Believe it or not, it was a conversation with my World of Warcraft guild leader: Otter

Bowling Green beer tastings

Professor Mike Coomes holds monthly beer tasting events. For a mere $7, attendees sample 3-4 ounces of up to seven beers and then discuss them.

Unsurprising, to me anyway, is that the people who come to these things enjoy the camaraderie and learning about new beers. Two of my favorite things about beer.

“It brings lots of groups of people together,” [coordinator of the events Justin] Rudisille said. “Undergraduates, graduate students and faculty. Sometimes you see people there that were at first strangers, but then after a while it’s like they become family.”

Ian Short, a junior, said it’s just a really great time for drinking good beer and engaging in quality conversation without anybody tipping the table over.

BG News: Move over wine, it’s beer tasting time