7th April 2008

Beer goggles explained

It’s an effect most of us have encountered at one time or another. The hour is late, someone new is looking mighty attractive to you, and then when you sober up you wonder “what the hell was I thinking?”

We call them “ten to two” girls (or guys). You know, they start looking really good at about ten minutes to 2 AM.

Can this phenomenon be expressed in a mathematical formula? Apparently so.

Researchers at Manchester University say while beauty is in the eye of the beer-holder, the amount of alcohol consumed is not the only factor.

Additional factors include the level of light in the pub or club, the drinker’s own eyesight and the room’s smokiness.

The distance between two people is also a factor.

beer goggles equation

  • An = number of units of alcohol consumed
  • S = smokiness of the room (graded from 0-10, where 0 clear air; 10 extremely smoky)
  • L = luminance of ‘person of interest’ (candelas per square meter; typically 1 pitch black; 150 as seen in normal room lighting)
  • Vo = Snellen visual acuity (6/6 normal; 6/12 just meets driving standard)
  • d = distance from ‘person of interest’ (meters; 0.5 to 3 meters)

BBC News: ‘Beer goggles’ effect explained

(via Mental Floss)

Speaking of beer goggles, this music video illustrates the phenomenon rather well. NSFW.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4BA6F5SfTM

Related posts

written by Al | posted in Beer, Humor, Off-topic | tagged , , , | 1 Comment

14th August 2007

Labels matter

A couple of months ago, Jay Brooks analyzed news of a study that found that more than anything labels and reviews by “experts” affect what we like.

The plan is to scientifically look at a variety of factors that may influence a purchase decision and to what extent they do influence. In addition to the label itself, they’re also planning on looking at lighting, background music, other people, and the influence of so-called expert or snob opinions.

I know from my time in retail that people really do shop the ratings. I’ve watched people walk wine aisles with a Wine Spectator in hand looking for specific wines that received a rating high enough for them to buy. I’ve even heard such people insult live human beings trying to suggest trying a different wine that they liked, but which perhaps wasn’t rated in that issue or didn’t get a rating high enough. I certainly don’t think ratings are unimportant or irrelevant, but I do think that they can be relied upon much too heavily.

The study specifically talked about wine, but applies to most products, including beer. We have specific experience with that, since Ron admittedly passed up Flying Dog beers for a long time because of the labels.

Of course, as happens far too often, beer is used as an example of something consumers can just pick up without thinking about, because they’re all pretty much the same.

And, Prof. Heymann adds, [people agonizing over their wine purchase] is regrettable. ‘People pick up a beer without thinking about it. They should be able to pick up wine the same way.’

Okay…. Where to begin? First, that she believes that wine is the only consumer product “loaded with emotional and psychological baggage” or is loaded with the most seems almost delusional. Has she not been watching the evolution of advertising over the past century? Every single consumer good is tied to an emotional need, that’s what advertising does. Does she think people buy expensive, inefficient cars unemotionally with cool detachment? What does she think brand loyalty is, for chrissakes, if not an emotional response? An entire industry exists for the sole purpose of selling us emotions.

But, of course, that’s small potatoes compared to that second-last sentence. Let’s look at that one more time. “People pick up a beer without thinking about it.” Well, I guess Anheuser-Busch can dismantle their gargantuan advertising and marketing budgets and concentrate on making a better tasting beer. Is the good professor smoking crack? People pick up their beer of choice because of years of relentless marketing and advertising designed to get them to do just that. Hellooooo! That she honestly doesn’t appear to think people consciously — or even unconsciously — choose what beer they buy is positively baffling.

Of course, Jay is “preaching to the choir” here. We’re all very aware of the power of marketing when it comes to beer here in the United States.

I also try to not let labels affect my purchasing decisions, and try to form my own opinions about things, especially beer. We beer snobs geeks have a terrible tendency to go too far in the opposite direction, automatically rejecting anything by one of those industrial brewers. Don’t be a sheep! Think for yourself!

In any event, Jay’s piece is worth a read.

Do Labels Matter?

Related posts

written by Al | posted in Beer, Marketing, News | tagged , | 1 Comment

3rd July 2007

Get paid to drink beer

I don’t know if the offer is still available, since the original post was put up several weeks ago, but if you drink beer and live in the Seattle area, you could participate in some paid market research.

Male Beer Drinkers Needed - Paid Market Research Study:

Fieldwork Seattle is conducting some paid market research studies with men ages 21-40 that enjoy drinking domestic beer. The research study will take no more than 2 and 1/2 hours to complete. Those who qualify and participate in the study will receive $125 for their time and opinions. Please call 425-822-4862 and reference the “Alcoholic Beverage” study when you call in.

Of course, you and I both know that “domestic beer” is code for Budweiser/Miller/Coors. But, heck, if you want to give me cash for drinking beer I’m not going to complain. Too bad I live on the wrong coast.

(via Tasty Booze)

Related posts

written by Al | posted in Beer, Marketing | tagged , | 0 Comments

30th April 2007

Beer News Sampler

Call for weak Euro beer
Austrian officials are pushing for a special “Euro 2008″ beer (read: low alcohol) and branded plastic “Euro 2008″ mugs (read: that can’t be used as projectiles) to be served when Austria and Switzerland host the 2008 European Championship. All in an effort to cut down on hooliganism.

Ale’s Well with the World
This article in Scientific American describes the findings of Charlie Bamforth, Anheuser-Busch Endowed Professor of Brewing Science at the University of California, Davis. Specifically, it was the discovery of how to store and ferment grain is what caused people to live together. Thus was born civilization, villages became cities, and technology advanced in leaps and bounds.

Workers Threaten Heineken
Workers at Heineken’s plant in St. Petersburg, Russia, have threatened a “slowdown” unless they get a 30 percent raise, a year-end bonus, extra pay for hazardous conditions and other concessions. It is unclear whether they’ll still be required to drink the beer.

Expert offers tips for pouring a perfect glass of beer
“Though it seems easiest to drink beer straight from the bottle or can, experts recommend pouring it into a clear glass for maximum enjoyment. Different varieties of beer should be served in different types of glasses.” Well, duh! It’s nice to see traditional media with a positive article about beer, however.

Thief betrays himself for beer
A German phone thief led police right to his front door when they called the stolen mobile to say he had won some free beer and he willingly gave his address. Stupid thief or entrapment? You be the judge. (Sorry.)

Go figure: Use math to get the perfect head of beer
U.S. researchers have found a mathematical formula that predicts how beer bubbles change over time. OK, maybe it won’t change the taste of beer that much—but, it has other valuable applications.

Related posts

written by Al | posted in Beer, News | tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

  • Archives

  • Sponsors

  • Sponsors

  • Shopping